[UgaBYTES] FOSS buinsess models

[Dean Mulozi]

Dear All, 
Would anyone know any existence of FOSS business models, consultancies, trainers in Tanzania? 

Kindly let me know, 

Dean Mulozi, 

 

--- On Tue, 7/14/09, Sarah mpagi <sarah at ugabytes.org> wrote:


From: Sarah mpagi <sarah at ugabytes.org>
Subject: Re: [UgaBYTES] AFRICA KOWLEDGE NETWORK launched in Dar es salaam |Strategy
To: ugabytes at lists.ugabytes.org
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 2:45 AM


Hullo all,

I find this discussion with alot of ideas. Pete's analysis highlights very
important issues to be considered in case AKN's project is to become
successful. For some of us who were not part with OKN, a lot has been
brought to light, how such project worked and the experiences they went
through, which I think they are very helpful to AKN project not to repeat
the same mistakes. Pete highlighted important things to be considered by
AKN.

Two more things i think are important for AKN to address, however it might
as well be addressed at activity level but it will be good to have it
planned.

1. customising the knowledge hubs (well, not very sure whether it will be
the same as "local content") in terms of languages better understood by the
target beneficiaries by country, otherwise such important information or
knowledge/content will be under utilised and the impact will not be
realised.

2. Packaging formats of such information/content should also be addressed,
remember that reading cultures in Africa are too low that majority learn by
visual aids. Knowing who your target groups are, will guide you to the
packaging formats of your knowledge/content.

Those are my two cents.


Best,
Sarah



Best,
Sarah





On 7/14/09, Ndaula Sulah <ndaulasula at ugabytes.org> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> What a great contribution from Pete - he brings to AKN his lessons of
> the past as a leader at OKN (UK). I didn't expect any less from his
> contribution.
>
> How points out pitfalls at;
>
> #1. Intended impact "Transform into knowledge hub" and it's measurability
> #2. Target groups (intended users and content aggregators)
>
> But on the positive end he joins earlier voice to note
>
> #1. Despite greater successes and lessons of different telecentre
> interventions there is no shortage of work that still needs to be done
> to increase impact.
> #2. He will dig reports on the lessons of OKN and shares them to the
> benefit of AKN
>
> Additionally, Pete points out areas that need keen improvement;
>
> #1. AKN idea thinking and presentation - using hubs is a great mind
> but given the global focus of the project, it will like trying to
> localize international knowledge which can not work for community
> targeted initiatives [save for specialists]
> #2. The strategy's relationship with; content vs knowledge, local vs
> global knowledge, target users vs target compilers and result vs
> process
>
>
> The biggest challenge he points out is that of localizing global
> information and knowledge especially if the project is targeting
> community and if it doesn't intend to do it through intermediaries.
> And indeed it was the weak end of OKN.
>
>
> Unanswered questions ----
>
> #1. Whose knowledge
> #2.  Are they information hubs or knowledge hubs
> #3. but either way how will knowledge be packaged; or can knowledge be
> packaged
>
>
> I guess friends at UNECA and members of the list would love to give
> some feed back and questions to Pete's issues - Abebe...
>
> Best regards,
> ---
> Sulah
>
>
>
> On 7/13/09, Meddie Mayanja <mmayanja at idrc.ca> wrote:
> > I am trying to get to speed on this initiative. It has not been easy
> since I
> > am just recovering from poor health - lots to catchup with.
> >
> > Pete: provides a great analysis especially linking what we we have
> learned
> > in the past from similar initiatives. I am sure the programming team will
> > take a close look at these issues raised here - if not done already.
> >
> > Understanding the target group and when one can confirm ICT centres have
> > been turned into knowledge hubs are key data points for me too.
> >
> > Best, Meddie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: ugabytes-bounces at lists.ugabytes.org
> > [ugabytes-bounces at lists.ugabytes.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cranston
> > [pete.cranston at btinternet.com]
> > Sent: July 13, 2009 5:58 AM
> > To: ugabytes at lists.ugabytes.org
> > Subject: Re: [UgaBYTES] AFRICA KOWLEDGE NETWORK launched in Dar es salaam
> >    |Strategy
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks everyone for this rich and interesting exchange. I have been
> reading
> > the Project Document and want to comment for two reasons:
> >
> > 1. Learning: people have suggested AKN could benfit from the learning
> from
> > our experience with OKN that could be useful. I have promised to dig out
> > learning reports, which I will do. Some of our work on content for
> > telecentre.org might also be useful. Specifically here I try and share
> some
> > learning about global vs. local
> >
> > 2. Local Content: as I announced on this list some time ago Peter
> Ballantyne
> > and I are doing some research into what is happening with Local Content
> in
> > Eastern (and, to some extent Southern) Africa since we both worked in the
> > area with OKN, IICD and telecentre.org. We are planning a small workshop
> > later this year, probably in Brussels in October, to try and bring
> together
> > people working in the area, international NGOs and funders to discuss how
> to
> > promote and extend the work since it is still a crucial part of
> development.
> > I am contacting people who have replied to our first call about how we
> can
> > organise that workshop and who is interested in taking the work further.
> We
> > are sharing information using the low bandwidth blogging platform, Maneno
> -
> > http://communitycontent.maneno.org. It is about content that I have some
> > questions.
> >
> > First, though, I hope the programme is a success. Any new investment in
> the
> > ICT4D in general and telecentres in particular has to be a good thing and
> > $1m isn't a small amount of money, even spread across the ECA, ECE,
> ECLAC,
> > and ESCAP region over three years. From the names that I recognise at the
> > Africa planning meeting I think there is as much wisdom within that group
> > about these issues as in any other group on the planet. Certainly there
> is
> > little I could add to that collection of brains and experience, a great
> > resource for the project managers. It's true that a lot of the language
> of
> > the project seems very familiar from similar projects over the years, but
> > then the world hasn't changed all that much either: people face the same
> > problems - in some cases worse - and although projects like
> telecentre.org
> > have done wonderful work there is no shortage of work that still needs to
> be
> > done. I've cooked lots of meals for my family but I still learn from new
> > recipes.
> >
> > Personally, I found it hard to understand what the project document is
> > saying about content and knowledge management. 'Knowledge' is in
> headlines,
> > but how people in communities will get involved in learning new things,
> or
> > in sharing what they know isn't exactly clear. One of the core building
> > blocks in the problem tree says, "Low capabilities of disadvantaged
> > communities in accessing, adapting and utilizing knowledge". It doesn't
> > specify whose knowledge is being talked about but a lot of the language,
> as
> > Polly says, is about global knowledge networking which was *by far* the
> > least successful part of OKN.
> >
> > MOre promisingly the document says, " Knowledge hubs will act as
> > intermediary stations between the local communities and the global
> knowledge
> > networks. Knowledge hubs will be localizing knowledge gained from peer
> ICT
> > access points, including those in other regions fitting the specificity
> of
> > the localities they are serving, while they will also contribute to
> creating
> > knowledge by providing experiences gained from the local community to the
> > benefit of the global networks at large."
> >
> > But then, " The project is mainly concerned with identifying and
> > implementing solutions that aggregate fragmented knowledge that is useful
> to
> > different disadvantaged  communities, and providing solutions that
> increase
> > utilization of this aggregated knowledge." As Polly says, we found that
> > external knowledge, especially from other parts of the globe, or even
> region
> > - doesn't translate easily - in terms of language, format, context and
> > relevance - to specific communities.  The document suggests there is a "a
> > common (global) pool of knowledge for each priority area" but our
> experience
> > was this may be true at a specialist level - doctors and nurses,
> academics
> > and agricultural specialist, physics teachers - but not at a village, or
> > community level. Is this a network to connect specialists, who can be
> > intermediaries? That would be useful, but it's not clear to me if that is
> > the target group since 'communities' are mentioned a lot.
> >
> > A problem is for me that the process relating to knowledge, content and
> > learning is simply captured in an arrow called, "Transformation Process".
> A
> > possible source of the confusion is that the document sometimes treats
> > knowledge as if it is something that can be packaged and shared like
> > pictures or music. This was one of our *fundamental errrors* in OKN (by
> > 'our' I mean the global team, not the people in African partner
> > organisations). In fact our experience reinforced what we should have
> > remembered, that learning is a social process. Making information
> accessible
> > is only the first step in that process. Further, in terms of knowledge
> > transfer - which to me means learning - from outside a community, a
> trusted
> > intermediary is vital. Our resources were spread too thin - we were also
> a
> > project that was sold as global - to focus enough on this area.
> >
> > It has been very interesting to talk again to Peter Balaba in Nakeseke
> and
> > Joseph Sekiku in FADECO about the way that they, like many others, use
> all
> > their media channels (radio, internet, print) to circulate local
> knowledge
> > through their community audiences. It is that process of engaging with
> > people, capturing what they know and do, sharing that with people who are
> > close enough to trust the sources - and sometimes passing on to the
> outside
> > especially useful ideas  - that I think is at the core of learning and
> > knowledge. But it is an expensive, long-term, people-based process so
> hard
> > to persuade funders to resource and even harder to finance through
> business
> > models built on providing information and entertainment services to
> paying
> > customers.
> >
> > I think it's an ambitious project which raises some questions, especially
> > the AKN aim of "Transforming selected ICT access points into knowledge
> hubs
> > of the global knowledge platform, providing, developing, organizing,
> sharing
> > and disseminating knowledge pertinent to these communities". and
> especially
> > what will be measured in the indicator, "Number of transformed ICT access
> > points into knowledge hubs" at evaluation time. I'd love to learn more:
> >
> > * What does the team understand by knowledge, and what role do they see
> for
> > local content?
> > * Will the project support the people-based social processes that make up
> > knowledge transfer, or learning, and if so how?
> > * How will the project identify the point at which an access point
> becomes a
> > knowledge hub? Will it be through having physical and electronic
> resources
> > in place - which a lot of places already have - or will it be more
> ambitious
> > and try to assess how effectively the hub supports the learning processes
> -
> > and if so, how?
> > * Finally, who is the project targetting?
> >
> > I think the proposal confirms, if it still needed confirming, that shared
> > access to digital resources through telecentres of one kind or another is
> > seen as a key tool in development. I wish everyone in the project all the
> > luck in the world and look forward to learning from your experiences.
> >
> > Best wishes
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> > Pete Cranston
> > skype: petecranston
> > mobile: